Debating human security in China

Shaun Breslin of the University of Warwick writes that while the concept of human security is often dismissed in China as an alien “Western” concept, there has been a long and detailed discussion of human security in Chinese-language policy and academic circles.

Breslin

Breslin

In his new article “Debating Human Security in China: Towards Discursive Power?,” Breslin argues that “human security” has essentially been “Sinicised” to reflect Chinese contexts and preferences. In the process, the emphasis on the individual human being that is normally at the heart of human security discourses is typically replaced by a focus on the collective humankind, and Chinese analyses are often packaged together with broader understandings of non-traditional security. This results in a Chinese version of the concept where the state remains a key referent point and actor – indeed, the state is the key guarantor of human security, not a threat to it.

This leads to the argument that it is this Chinese definition that Chinese practices should be judged against, and not supposed universal definitions that in reality only reflect the history and values of Western states.

Breslin provides an original and useful account of these debates.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s